Skip to main content
Logan Leiter
All work
AnalyticsCX OpsOperating Model

A single definition of on-time

Helped the operation agree what “on-time” means and put promise-date adherence in a weekly review customers can actually feel.

Figures are illustrative; client details anonymized. A 24-hour reply is a target, not a result.

Organization
A global industrial manufacturer
Role
CX partner to operations and analytics
Timeframe
2025 – 2026
Tools
Power BI, ERP snapshots

The situation

One definition of on-time, a promise date the customer can trust, and a weekly look at the exceptions.

What I found

The reports disagreed about on-time performance. Daily snapshots could not show how long an order sat between stages.

What was in the way

Each team had a reasonable local definition. None of them was the customer’s definition. Without stage timing, delay and late promise-setting looked the same.

What I did

A single OTD dashboard, a documented reporting requirement, a weekly review, and the same numbers in the CX conversation.

Why it mattered

Customers experience a promise date, not an internal report. If four dashboards disagree, the review becomes an argument.

Summary

The operation had several versions of on-time delivery and snapshots that could not show where an order sat between stages. The work was to agree one definition, put it in a dashboard, and give the exception list a weekly home — including in the CX review.

Context

Delivery is a customer-experience number, not only an operations number. The two reviews should not tell different stories.

The problem

  • Multiple non-standard on-time reports were in circulation.
  • Snapshots could not show stage-to-stage timing.
  • The CX conversation about delivery had no shared baseline.

The approach

  1. 01Kicked off a single OTD dashboard with executive sponsorship.
  2. 02Documented a minimum reporting requirement.
  3. 03Put a weekly exception review on the calendar.
  4. 04Used the same figures in the customer-experience review.

Illustrative figures

Figures are illustrative; client details anonymized. A 24-hour reply is a target, not a result.

Definition of on-time

Illustrative

The teams now use one definition of on-time.

Promise-date adherence

Illustrative

Promise-date exceptions have a weekly review customers can feel.

What exists

OTD dashboard

One definition, with exception visibility.

Weekly review cadence

A standing look at promise-date misses.

Takeaways

  • If four reports disagree, the review becomes an argument.
  • The customer experiences a promise date, not an internal definition.
  • Do not publish an on-time percentage until the dashboard and the definition match.
NextFeedback with an owner

Bring a problem

Tell me where customers are waiting.

A short note is enough: what is breaking, what you have already tried, and what a good month would look like. If I am the wrong person, I will say so.